[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908120840.52c68ca4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:08:40 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>, Lyude <cpaul@...hat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
between commit:
9909113cc48a ("drm/i915/gen9: Only copy WM results for changed pipes to skl_hw")
from Linus' tree and commits:
2722efb90b34 ("drm/i915/gen9: Only copy WM results for changed pipes to skl_hw")
27082493e9c6 ("drm/i915/skl: Update DDB values atomically with wms/plane attrs")
from the drm-intel tree.
I fixed it up (I just used the drm-intel tree version) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists