lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871t0u5ken.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 08 Sep 2016 11:14:08 -0700
From:   "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        <andi.kleen@...el.com>, <aaron.lu@...el.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        "Shaohua Li" <shli@...nel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 04/10] mm, THP, swap: Add swap cluster allocate/free functions

Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> On 09/07/2016 10:16 PM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> 
>> The swap cluster allocation/free functions are added based on the
>> existing swap cluster management mechanism for SSD.  These functions
>> don't work for the rotating hard disks because the existing swap cluster
>> management mechanism doesn't work for them.  The hard disks support may
>> be added if someone really need it.  But that needn't be included in
>> this patchset.
>> 
>> This will be used for the THP (Transparent Huge Page) swap support.
>> Where one swap cluster will hold the contents of each THP swapped out.
>
> Which tree this series is based against ? This patch does not apply
> on the mainline kernel.

This series is based on 8/31 head of mmotm/master.  I stated it in
00/10, but I know it is hided inside other text and not obvious at all.
Is there some way to make it obvious?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ