linux-kernel - Re: [RFCv4 0/7] arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU cpumasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160908181657.GX10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:16:57 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 0/7]  arm_pmu/perf tools: play nicely with CPU PMU
 cpumasks

On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 01:25:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:21:45AM +0100, Mark Rutland escreveu:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm trying to make the perf tool play better with PMUs in heterogeneous systems
> > (e.g. big.LITTLE), where there are several logical PMUs, each covering a subset
> > of CPUs.
> 
> So I added 6/7 and 7/7 to my local perf/core branch, I think they can go
> before the others, Peter, do you want me to take the kernel parts as
> well?

arm pmu stuff usually goes through the arm tree. Up to Mark I suppose.