[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:15:51 -0300
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-dl@...is.sssup.it
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: document behavior of sched_yield()
On 09/09/2016 09:38 AM, luca abeni wrote:
> Then, the "since the remaining runtime goes to 0" part of my suggestion
> is wrong and the sentence should be rephrased in some other way.
>
> Or am I misunderstanding what you are saying
Ack, maybe I was not precise enough, sorry... I was just talking about
the "since the remaining runtime goes to 0" part of your suggestion.
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists