linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: reset: oxnas: Update for OX820

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2016 15:43:26 +0200
From:   Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: reset: oxnas: Update for OX820

Hi Philipp,

On 09/09/2016 03:35 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Neil,
> 
> Am Freitag, den 09.09.2016, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Neil Armstrong:
>> Add new compatible string for reset and sys-ctrl for the Oxford
>> Semiconductor OX820 Support.
>> Drop the OX810SE indices since they moved in a dedicated include file.
> 
> Not sure if the OX820 reset controller should be considered "compatible"
> to OX810SE. The register layout and usage is the same, but the reset
> indices are different. Does this warrant a new compatible string, or
> should this be
> 	compatible = "oxsemi,ox820-reset", "oxsemi,ox810se-reset"?

As indicated on the cover letter, I'll like to have each supported SoC
as a specific compatible, to ease maintaining the drivers and
clarify what HW is supported.

Having an include file per SoC is also part of the process.

> 
[...]
> 
> Please add a pointer to include/dt-bindings/reset/oxsemi,ox8{10se,20}.h

OK, will do in v2.

> 
> Otherwise I'm fine with the series, pending DT maintainer approval.
> 
> regards
> Philipp
> 

Thanks,
Neil