linux-kernel - Re: Regulator probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 9 Sep 2016 18:18:41 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Regulator probe

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 08:04:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:38 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > If I remove has_full_constraints() call I will get EPROBE_DEFER on
> > > all
> > > optional regulators IIRC.

> > Yes.

> Which basically means that's not a solution I'm trying to get.

Right, it's not expected to be something that's useful in a finished
system just something that's minimally harmful during development.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)