lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a98baa3-3685-ba87-67c3-f9855d19bb02@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:42:36 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 05/30] ACPI-processor: Rename jump labels in
 acpi_processor_preregister_performance()

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:38:40 +0200

Adjust jump labels according to the current Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 16 +++++++---------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 1ebe580..2fc82e7 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -621,12 +621,12 @@ int acpi_processor_preregister_performance(
 
 		if (pr->performance) {
 			retval = -EBUSY;
-			goto err_out;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 
 		if (!performance || !per_cpu_ptr(performance, i)) {
 			retval = -EINVAL;
-			goto err_out;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ int acpi_processor_preregister_performance(
 		}
 	}
 	if (retval)
-		goto err_ret;
+		goto clear_cpu;
 
 	/*
 	 * Now that we have _PSD data from all CPUs, lets setup P-state 
@@ -689,12 +689,12 @@ int acpi_processor_preregister_performance(
 
 			if (match_pdomain->num_processors != count_target) {
 				retval = -EINVAL;
-				goto err_ret;
+				goto clear_cpu;
 			}
 
 			if (pdomain->coord_type != match_pdomain->coord_type) {
 				retval = -EINVAL;
-				goto err_ret;
+				goto clear_cpu;
 			}
 
 			cpumask_set_cpu(j, covered_cpus);
@@ -719,8 +719,7 @@ int acpi_processor_preregister_performance(
 				     pr->performance->shared_cpu_map);
 		}
 	}
-
-err_ret:
+ clear_cpu:
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
 		pr = per_cpu(processors, i);
 		if (!pr || !pr->performance)
@@ -734,8 +733,7 @@ err_ret:
 		}
 		pr->performance = NULL; /* Will be set for real in register */
 	}
-
-err_out:
+ unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
 	free_cpumask_var(covered_cpus);
 	return retval;
-- 
2.10.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ