[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9965aba5-4da1-6a28-8940-04228586b525@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:55:30 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/30] ACPI-processor: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:06:18 +0200
The local variable "ppc" will be set to an appropriate value a bit later.
Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 86256bd..43f8eef 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
struct acpi_processor *pr;
- unsigned int ppc = 0;
+ unsigned int ppc;
if (event == CPUFREQ_START && ignore_ppc <= 0) {
ignore_ppc = 0;
--
2.10.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists