[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf13507b-b985-11a5-5b70-4441077968af@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:56:15 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/30] ACPI-processor: Delete an unnecessary initialisation in
acpi_processor_get_performance_info()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:09:32 +0200
The local variable "result" will be set to an appropriate value
a bit later. Thus omit the explicit initialisation at the beginning.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index 43f8eef..de82338 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performance_states(struct acpi_processor *pr)
int acpi_processor_get_performance_info(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
- int result = 0;
+ int result;
if (!pr || !pr->performance || !pr->handle)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.10.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists