[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160910145320.bg6s6wo5ya7zzw2n@pd.tnic>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 16:53:20 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: dougthompson@...ssion.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/edac: NO_IRQ removal from powerpc-only drivers
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:57:08PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We'd like to eventually remove NO_IRQ on powerpc, so remove usages of it
> from powerpc-only drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> ---
> drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> index ca63d0da8889..e12b8e166a53 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>
> pdata = pci->pvt_info;
> pdata->name = "mpc85xx_pci_err";
> - pdata->irq = NO_IRQ;
> + pdata->irq = 0;
>
> plat_data = op->dev.platform_data;
> if (!plat_data) {
So all of those pdata structs come from kzalloc() so you don't really
have to assign to 0 - simply kill the line.
> @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_l2_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>
> pdata = edac_dev->pvt_info;
> pdata->name = "mpc85xx_l2_err";
> - pdata->irq = NO_IRQ;
> + pdata->irq = 0;
> edac_dev->dev = &op->dev;
> dev_set_drvdata(edac_dev->dev, edac_dev);
> edac_dev->ctl_name = pdata->name;
> @@ -1058,7 +1058,7 @@ static int mpc85xx_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>
> pdata = mci->pvt_info;
> pdata->name = "mpc85xx_mc_err";
> - pdata->irq = NO_IRQ;
> + pdata->irq = 0;
> mci->pdev = &op->dev;
> pdata->edac_idx = edac_mc_idx++;
> dev_set_drvdata(mci->pdev, mci);
That part went into drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c which is only the
freescale memory controller being shared between ARM and PPC, see
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=for-next
But that shouldn't change the issue wrt ->irq as now it is implicitly 0.
IOW, you can drop this hunk.
Please send v2 against the above branch or linux-next.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists