[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473533513.19464.3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 11:51:53 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 01/23] clocksource: sh_cmt: compute rate before
registration again
On Sat, 2016-09-10 at 14:56 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> if (foo)
> bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> CONST);)
> else
> rab();
>
>
> Is NOT. Simply because the pattern of a 'if ()' condition without braces
> suggests a single line statement to follow. Then the reading flow stops
> because there is more than one line. While:
> if (foo) {
> bar(foo->something, foo->somemore, foo->other,
> CONST);)
> } else {
> rab();
> }
While I mostly agree, CodingStyle says:
------------------------------------------------------
Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
if (condition)
action();
and
if (condition)
do_this();
else
do_that();
------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps that should be "with single line statements" instead.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists