[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609100826500.9305@nanos>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 08:35:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add additional Intel CPU models to crystal_khz
whitelist
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> In commit aa297292d708 ("x86/tsc: Enumerate SKL cpu_khz and tsc_khz via
You cite a commit here, which is nice. If you look at the commit message
then you will notice that _before_ the sentence describing the commit there
is a prefix, which denotes the subsystem to which this patch applies. But
you insist on sending patches w/o a prefix.
Can you please stop this? It's annoying because I have to figure out where
the patch belongs to and have to edit the subject line before applying the
patch.
> @@ -688,11 +688,19 @@ unsigned long native_calibrate_tsc(void)
> switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> case 0x4E: /* SKL */
> case 0x5E: /* SKL */
> + case 0x8E: /* KBL */
> + case 0x9E: /* KBL */
asm/intel-family.h provides proper defines for this. And before you add
those, please make a seperate patch which converts the existing hex
constants to the defines.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists