lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 10 Sep 2016 01:01:00 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:     richardcochran@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Move runnable code (tests) from Documentation to
 selftests

On Fri,  9 Sep 2016 16:22:41 -0600
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:

> Move runnable code (tests) from Documentation to selftests and update
> Makefiles to work under selftests.
> 
> Jon Corbet and I discussed this in an email thread and as per that
> discussion, this patch series moves all the tests that are under the
> Documentation directory to selftests. There is more runnable code in
> the form of examples and utils and that is going to be another patch
> series. I moved just the tests and left the documentation files as is.

I'm fine with the idea, but it looks like a couple of tweaks are needed,
in particular to avoid leaving behind dangling references in
Documentation/Makefile that cause build errors.

I think the individual patches probably need a wider CC list as well.
I'd use the get_maintainer script (or git) to see who has taken an
interest in the individual tests and make sure they are aware of the
move.

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ