[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160910.211928.1782362547702903708.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2016 21:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: javier@....samsung.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, jchapman@...alix.com,
aduyck@...antis.com, vyasevich@...il.com, fw@...len.de,
acme@...stprotocols.net, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, stephen@...workplumber.org,
tom@...bertland.com, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, a@...table.cc,
jhs@...atatu.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, mugunthanvnm@...com,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jiri@...lanox.com, nhorman@...driver.com, jarod@...hat.com,
kaber@...sh.net, pabeni@...hat.com, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] net: use IS_ENABLED() instead of checking for
built-in or module
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:43:12 -0400
> This trivial series replace the open coding to check for a Kconfig symbol
> being built-in or module, with IS_ENABLED() macro that does exactly that.
>
> Using the macro makes the code more readable by helping abstract away some
> of the Kconfig built-in and module enable details.
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists