[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160912100719.GJ9449@lukather>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:07:19 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...e-electrons.com>,
jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, wens@...e.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mfd: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:59:23AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > >> +static const struct of_device_id sun4i_gpadc_mfd_of_match[] = {
> > >> + {
> > >> + .compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-a10-ts",
> > >> + .data = &sun4i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> > >> + }, {
> > >> + .compatible = "allwinner,sun5i-a13-ts",
> > >> + .data = &sun5i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> > >> + }, {
> > >> + .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ts",
> > >> + .data = &sun6i_gpadc_mfd_cells,
> > >> + }, { /* sentinel */ }
> > >> +};
> > >
> > > Don't mix OF and MFD functionality.
> > >
> > > Why don't you create a node for "iio_hwmon" and have
> > > platform_of_populate() do your bidding?
> > >
> >
> > We are using a stable binding which we cannot modify. This means, the DT
> > in its current state can only be modified to add features, which is not
> > the case of this driver (it is a rewriting of an existing driver which
> > uses the rtp node).
>
> Then use .data = <defined model ID> and set up a switch() in .probe().
Uh? Why? It just adds a non-standard indirection, while using
of_match_device is very standard, and used extensively in Linux.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists