linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1473675413.12398.29.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:16:53 +0800
From:   YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
To:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
CC:     <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
        Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
        Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jie Qiu <jie.qiu@...iatek.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701

Hi CK,

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:37 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, YT:
> 
> On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 19:24 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
> 
> [snip...]
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > index 4b4e449..465819b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ struct mtk_ddp_comp_match {
> >  
> >  static const struct mtk_ddp_comp_match mtk_ddp_matches[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_AAL]	= { MTK_DISP_AAL,	0, NULL },
> > +	[DDP_COMPONENT_BLS]	= { MTK_DISP_PWM,	0, NULL },
> 
> I think BLS is different than PWM, so this statement should be
> 
> [DDP_COMPONENT_BLS] = { MTK_DISP_BLS, 0, NULL };
The BLS module actually is a multifunction device, one of them is the
PWM function.  We only upstream PWM function [1] now, and it is
accepted.  When there are real use case (gamma function), we will update
this part.  What do you think?

Regards,
yt.shen

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9223001/

> 
> 
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	0, &ddp_color },
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR1]	= { MTK_DISP_COLOR,	1, &ddp_color },
> >  	[DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0]	= { MTK_DPI,		0, NULL },
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
>