linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm-cci: add cci_enable_port_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:35:38 +0100
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:     Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>, will.deacon@....com,
        olof@...om.net, mark.rutland@....com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        a.hajda@...sung.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de, xie.baoyou@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm-cci: add cci_enable_port_for_self() declaration in
 arm-cci.h

On 12/09/16 11:33, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:2027:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'cci_enable_port_for_self' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is used in a few files,
> but should be declared in a header file.
>
> So this patch adds the declaration in arm-cci.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> ---
>  include/linux/arm-cci.h | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-cci.h b/include/linux/arm-cci.h
> index 521ec1f..b88f6fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-cci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-cci.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,10 @@ struct device_node;
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI
>  extern bool cci_probed(void);
> +extern asmlinkage void __naked cci_enable_port_for_self(void);
>  #else
>  static inline bool cci_probed(void) { return false; }
> +static inline void ci_enable_port_for_self(void) { return; }
>  #endif
>

Don't you think the above definitions should depend on

ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL than ARM_CCI ?


Suzuki