[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1473681216-20025-2-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:53:32 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: manfred@...orfullife.com, dave@...olabs.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ipc/sem: do not call wake_sem_queue_do() prematurely
... as this call should obviously be paired with its _prepare()
counterpart. At least whenever possible, as there is no harm in
calling it bogusly as we do now in a few places. Immediate error
semop(2) paths that are far from ever having the task block can
be simplified and avoid a few unnecessary loads on their way out
of the call as it is not deeply nested.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
---
ipc/sem.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 5e318c5f749d..a4e8bb2fae38 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1887,16 +1887,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
}
error = -EFBIG;
- if (max >= sma->sem_nsems)
- goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+ if (max >= sma->sem_nsems) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto out_free;
+ }
error = -EACCES;
- if (ipcperms(ns, &sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO))
- goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+ if (ipcperms(ns, &sma->sem_perm, alter ? S_IWUGO : S_IRUGO)) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto out_free;
+ }
error = security_sem_semop(sma, sops, nsops, alter);
- if (error)
- goto out_rcu_wakeup;
+ if (error) {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ goto out_free;
+ }
error = -EIDRM;
locknum = sem_lock(sma, sops, nsops);
@@ -2039,7 +2045,6 @@ sleep_again:
out_unlock_free:
sem_unlock(sma, locknum);
-out_rcu_wakeup:
rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
out_free:
--
2.6.6
Powered by blists - more mailing lists