[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160912122549.GZ27946@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:25:49 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>,
NeilBrown <nfbrown@...ell.com>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, robh@...nel.org,
Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@...il.com>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@...escale.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, r.baldyga@...sung.com,
grygorii.strashko@...com,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
device-mainlining@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Bird, Timothy" <Tim.Bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 0/4] Introduce usb charger framework to deal with the
usb gadget power negotation
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 07:57:26AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The wm831x driver in the patch series is an example of such hardware -
> > it is purely a power manager, it has no USB PHY hardware at all. It's a
> The "probe" routine calls
> + usb_charger_find_by_name(wm831x_pdata->usb_gadget);
> Presumably wm831x_pdata is initialised by a board file?
Yes.
> I strongly suspect it is initialized to "usb-charger.0" because the
> names given to usb chargers are "usb-charger.%d" in discovery order.
> I don't see this being at all useful if there is ever more than one
> usb-charger.
> Do you?
It's no worse than any other board file situation - if someone has that
problem they get to fix it.
> So how can this wm831x driver actually find out what sort of charger is
> connected and so set the power limit? I just don't see this working *at*
> *all*.
The whole point from the point of view of the wm831x driver is that it
just wants something to tell it how much current it's allowed to draw, I
appreciate that doesn't change your analysis of the bit in the middle
but the consumer driver bit seems fine here.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists