[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbif_sstN9w19+-C+yLGJwFYuHPz_c22JvpMxUWpgSt8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 14:48:03 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] gpio: pca953x: refactor pca953x_write_regs()
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski
<bgolaszewski@...libre.com> wrote:
> Avoid the unnecessary if-else in pca953x_write_regs() by splitting
> the routine into smaller, specialized functions and calling the right
> one via a function pointer held in struct pca953x_chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists