linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77a03549-232b-f73e-216f-6e332192cb1c@st.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 15:38:32 +0200
From:   Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Bruno Herrera <bruherrera@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] pinctrl: Add IRQ support to STM32 gpios

Hi Linus,

On 09/12/2016 02:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
>
>> Just one question, when you say "super-complex irqchip in use", do you mean
>> I could use another (simplest) solution to handle this EXTI controller?
>
> I don't know, GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP is to be used for some specific
> cases documented in Documentation/gpio/driver.txt.
>
> For anything complex, we either need to have this hairy code
> or invent new abstractions.
>
Ok I see
.
> For now, I assume this is needed...

Yes it is.

Regards
Alex

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>