| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAOw6vbJKggHaA9zeeiL2FUR7oraMRdVEocmLzrtBtM7mjBCVcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:52:53 -0400
From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>
To: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@...el.com>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] drm/bridge: analogix_dp: detect Sink PSR state
after configuring the PSR
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> Make sure the request PSR state takes effect in analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
> function, or print the sink PSR error state if we failed to apply the
> requested PSR setting.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Update commit message
> - Add DP_TIMEOUT_PSR_LOOP_MS marcos
> - Correct the return values of analogix_dp_send_psr_spd()
>
> Changes in v2:
> - A bunch of good fixes from Sean
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c | 6 ++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> index 5fe3982..c0ce16a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c
> @@ -116,8 +116,7 @@ int analogix_dp_enable_psr(struct device *dev)
> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
> psr_vsc.DB1 = EDP_VSC_PSR_STATE_ACTIVE | EDP_VSC_PSR_CRC_VALUES_VALID;
>
> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> - return 0;
> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_enable_psr);
>
> @@ -139,8 +138,7 @@ int analogix_dp_disable_psr(struct device *dev)
> psr_vsc.DB0 = 0;
> psr_vsc.DB1 = 0;
>
> - analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> - return 0;
> + return analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(dp, &psr_vsc);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(analogix_dp_disable_psr);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> index d564e90..a27f1e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #define MAX_EQ_LOOP 5
>
> #define DP_TIMEOUT_LOOP_MS msecs_to_jiffies(1)
> +#define DP_TIMEOUT_PSR_LOOP_MS msecs_to_jiffies(300)
Same comment here re: units.
300ms seems like a really long time. Why does it take this long?
Sean
>
> /* DP_MAX_LANE_COUNT */
> #define DPCD_ENHANCED_FRAME_CAP(x) (((x) >> 7) & 0x1)
> @@ -248,8 +249,8 @@ void analogix_dp_config_video_slave_mode(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_enable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_disable_scrambling(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp);
> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc);
> ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
> #endif /* _ANALOGIX_DP_CORE_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> index 15a4cf0..7fd4ed0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c
> @@ -1004,10 +1004,12 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_psr_crc(struct analogix_dp_device *dp)
> writel(PSR_VID_CRC_ENABLE, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_CRC_CON);
> }
>
> -void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> - struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
> +int analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> + struct edp_vsc_psr *vsc)
> {
> + unsigned long timeout;
> unsigned int val;
> + u8 sink;
>
> /* don't send info frame */
> val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
> @@ -1048,6 +1050,25 @@ void analogix_dp_send_psr_spd(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> val = readl(dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
> val |= IF_EN;
> writel(val, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_PKT_SEND_CTL);
> +
> + timeout = jiffies + DP_TIMEOUT_PSR_LOOP_MS;
> + while (time_before(jiffies, timeout)) {
> + val = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&dp->aux, DP_PSR_STATUS, &sink);
> + if (val != 1) {
> + dev_err(dp->dev, "PSR_STATUS read failed ret=%d", val);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> +
> + if ((vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_ACTIVE_RFB) ||
> + (!vsc->DB1 && sink == DP_PSR_SINK_INACTIVE))
> + return 0;
> +
> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
> + }
> +
> + dev_warn(dp->dev, "Failed to apply PSR, sink state was [%x]", sink);
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
>
> ssize_t analogix_dp_transfer(struct analogix_dp_device *dp,
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists