lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160912040546.GA14625@obsidianresearch.com>
Date:   Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:05:46 -0600
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
        Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
        "moderated list:TPM DEVICE DRIVER" 
        <tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix buffer overflow in /dev/tpm0

On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:19:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> tpm_write() does not check whether the buffer has at least enough space
> for the header before passing it to tpm_transmit() so an overflow can
> happen.

Eh?

tpm_write uses a hard wired buffer size of TPM_BUFSIZE when working
with tpm_transmit.

in_size is never used except for the copy. We should probably fix that
to sanity check the header length vs in_size.

That doesn't seem to be a security issue however because the header
length is propery limited to TPM_BUFSIZE and the data buffer is
allocated specifically for that process using kzalloc.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ