linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:14:59 -0500
From:   Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/20] mm: Access BOOT related data in the clear

On 09/09/2016 11:38 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:37:38PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> BOOT data (such as EFI related data) is not encyrpted when the system is
>> booted and needs to be accessed as non-encrypted.  Add support to the
>> early_memremap API to identify the type of data being accessed so that
>> the proper encryption attribute can be applied.  Currently, two types
>> of data are defined, KERNEL_DATA and BOOT_DATA.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>> ---
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> index 031db21..e3bdc5a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
>> @@ -419,6 +419,25 @@ void unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(phys_addr_t phys, void *addr)
>>  	iounmap((void __iomem *)((unsigned long)addr & PAGE_MASK));
>>  }
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Architecure override of __weak function to adjust the protection attributes
>> + * used when remapping memory.
>> + */
>> +pgprot_t __init early_memremap_pgprot_adjust(resource_size_t phys_addr,
>> +					     unsigned long size,
>> +					     enum memremap_owner owner,
>> +					     pgprot_t prot)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If memory encryption is enabled and BOOT_DATA is being mapped
>> +	 * then remove the encryption bit.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (_PAGE_ENC && (owner == BOOT_DATA))
>> +		prot = __pgprot(pgprot_val(prot) & ~_PAGE_ENC);
>> +
>> +	return prot;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> Hmm, so AFAICT, only arch/x86/xen needs KERNEL_DATA and everything else
> is BOOT_DATA.
> 
> So instead of touching so many files and changing early_memremap(),
> why can't you remove _PAGE_ENC by default on x86 and define a specific
> early_memremap() for arch/x86/xen/ which you call there?
> 
> That would make this patch soo much smaller and the change simpler.

Yes it would.  I'll take a look into that.

> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
>> index 5a2631a..f9286c6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
>> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ int __init efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md)
>>  		 * So just always get our own virtual map on the CPU.
>>  		 *
>>  		 */
>> -		md = early_memremap(p, sizeof (*md));
>> +		md = early_memremap(p, sizeof (*md), BOOT_DATA);
> 
> WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #432: FILE: drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c:389:
> +               md = early_memremap(p, sizeof (*md), BOOT_DATA);
> 
> Please integrate checkpatch.pl into your workflow so that you can catch
> small style nits like this. And don't take its output too seriously... :-)

I did run checkpatch against everything, but was always under the
assumption that I shouldn't change existing warnings/errors like this.
If it's considered ok since I'm touching that line of code then I'll
take care of those situations.

Thanks,
Tom

> 
>>  		if (!md) {
>>  			pr_err_once("early_memremap(%pa, %zu) failed.\n",
>>  				    &p, sizeof (*md));
>> @@ -501,7 +501,8 @@ int __init efi_config_parse_tables(void *config_tables, int count, int sz,
>>  	if (efi.properties_table != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR) {
>>  		efi_properties_table_t *tbl;
>>  
>> -		tbl = early_memremap(efi.properties_table, sizeof(*tbl));
>> +		tbl = early_memremap(efi.properties_table, sizeof(*tbl),
>> +				     BOOT_DATA);
>>  		if (tbl == NULL) {
>>  			pr_err("Could not map Properties table!\n");
>>  			return -ENOMEM;