[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7018CCD949A@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:09:49 +0000
From: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array
pdata->regulators
On 08 September 2016 10:47, Colin King wrote:
> To: Support Opensource; Liam Girdwood; Mark Brown
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: da9055: remove null pointer check on array pdata->regulators
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> pdata->regulators is an array of DA9052_MAX_REGULATORS struct
> regulator_init_data pointers hence cannot be null, so the null pointer
> check on pdata->regulators is redundant. Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9055-
> regulator.c
> index d029c94..a118f63 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da9055-regulator.c
> @@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ static int da9055_regulator_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
> config.driver_data = regulator;
> config.regmap = da9055->regmap;
>
> - if (pdata && pdata->regulators) {
> + if (pdata) {
> config.init_data = pdata->regulators[pdev->id];
> } else {
> ret = da9055_regulator_dt_init(pdev, regulator, &config,
> --
> 2.9.3
Yes, it's true.
One my colleagues just pointed out why they had déjà vu.
May I refer to the answer that was given back in March,
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8679771/
Regards,
Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists