[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNSLZ-Ck+40LZLdpEXPaBm+61AtrpRPgAcTCojWSsTBQDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:35:39 -0500
From: Leo Li <pku.leo@...il.com>
To: Tracy Smith <tlsmith3777@...il.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Gao Pan <pandy.gao@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Tracy Smith <tlsmith3777@...il.com> wrote:
> Hello, bus recovery is needed generally speaking because of potential
> protocol errors that might cause a failure condition hanging the bus.
>
> It happens frequently during bring-up of new I2C devices because firmware in
> I2C controllers fail to handle properly protocol errors.
>
> Can NXP add bus recovery for the LS1021A and LS1043A in a separate patch--
> unless there is no HW bus recovery mechanism?
>
> The concern is while fixing I.MX, NXP will fail to fix the driver bus
> recovery for the LS1021A and LS1043A and the bus will hang.
>
> If bus recovery is supported on the LS1021A and the LS1043A, a patch should
> be provided or added in this patch instead of simply disabling bus recovery.
> Request NXP to consider the patch if there is HW support for bus recovery.
FYI. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/573879/ This seem to be the
patch you are asking for. I have asked the original developer to
update the patch according to Wolfram's comment and work together with
the current pinctrl/gpio based recovery. In the meanwhile you can
make use of the patch for now for LS1021A and LS1043A if necessary.
Regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists