linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 016/192] [PATCH 016/135] e1000e: fix division by zero on jumbo MTUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:58:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@...nix.com>,
        Leonid Bloch <leonid@...nix.com>,
        Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 016/192] [PATCH 016/135] e1000e: fix division by zero on jumbo MTUs

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit b77ac46bbae862dcb3f51296825c940404c69b0f ]

This patch fixes possible division by zero in receive
interrupt handler when working without adaptive interrupt
moderation.

The adaptive interrupt moderation mechanism is typically
disabled on jumbo MTUs.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@...nix.com>
Signed-off-by: Leonid Bloch <leonid@...nix.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -1959,8 +1959,10 @@ static irqreturn_t e1000_intr_msix_rx(in
 	 * previous interrupt.
 	 */
 	if (rx_ring->set_itr) {
-		writel(1000000000 / (rx_ring->itr_val * 256),
-		       rx_ring->itr_register);
+		u32 itr = rx_ring->itr_val ?
+			  1000000000 / (rx_ring->itr_val * 256) : 0;
+
+		writel(itr, rx_ring->itr_register);
 		rx_ring->set_itr = 0;
 	}