linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 068/192] [PATCH 071/135] net: cavium: liquidio: fix check for in progress flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160912152201.793912219@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:59:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 068/192] [PATCH 071/135] net: cavium: liquidio: fix check for in progress flag

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

[ Upstream commit 19a6d156a7bd080f3a855a40a4a08ab475e34b4a ]

smatch detected a suspicious looking bitop condition:

drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c:2529
  handle_timestamp() warn: suspicious bitop condition

(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags | SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS is always non-zero,
so the logic is definitely not correct.  Use & to mask the correct
bit.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/lio_main.c
@@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static void handle_timestamp(struct octe
 
 	octeon_swap_8B_data(&resp->timestamp, 1);
 
-	if (unlikely((skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags | SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS) != 0)) {
+	if (unlikely((skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_IN_PROGRESS) != 0)) {
 		struct skb_shared_hwtstamps ts;
 		u64 ns = resp->timestamp;