[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160912152203.425661118@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:00:15 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 106/192] [PATCH 110/135] ntp: Fix ADJ_SETOFFSET being used w/ ADJ_NANO
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
[ Upstream commit dd4e17ab704269bce71402285f5e8b9ac24b1eff ]
Recently, in commit 37cf4dc3370f I forgot to check if the timeval being passed
was actually a timespec (as is signaled with ADJ_NANO).
This resulted in that patch breaking ADJ_SETOFFSET users who set
ADJ_NANO, by rejecting valid timespecs that were compared with
valid timeval ranges.
This patch addresses this by checking for the ADJ_NANO flag and
using the timepsec check instead in that case.
Reported-by: Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Fixes: 37cf4dc3370f "time: Verify time values in adjtimex ADJ_SETOFFSET to avoid overflow"
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453417415-19110-2-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/time/ntp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/time/ntp.c
+++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c
@@ -679,8 +679,18 @@ int ntp_validate_timex(struct timex *txc
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_TIME))
return -EPERM;
- if (!timeval_inject_offset_valid(&txc->time))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (txc->modes & ADJ_NANO) {
+ struct timespec ts;
+
+ ts.tv_sec = txc->time.tv_sec;
+ ts.tv_nsec = txc->time.tv_usec;
+ if (!timespec_inject_offset_valid(&ts))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ } else {
+ if (!timeval_inject_offset_valid(&txc->time))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists