linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, mincore2(): retrieve dax and tlb-size attributes of an address range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4i0j2d9NqqG4JJFDykP400xT+JcO9wA+d9MiRJTBHTfbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 10:15:35 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:     Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm, mincore2(): retrieve dax and tlb-size
 attributes of an address range

On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:31:35AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> As evidenced by this bug report [1], userspace libraries are interested
>> in whether a mapping is DAX mapped, i.e. no intervening page cache.
>> Rather than using the ambiguous VM_MIXEDMAP flag in smaps, provide an
>> explicit "is dax" indication as a new flag in the page vector populated
>> by mincore.
>>
>> There are also cases, particularly for testing and validating a
>> configuration to know the hardware mapping geometry of the pages in a
>> given process address range.  Consider filesystem-dax where a
>> configuration needs to take care to align partitions and block
>> allocations before huge page mappings might be used, or
>> anonymous-transparent-huge-pages where a process is opportunistically
>> assigned large pages.  mincore2() allows these configurations to be
>> surveyed and validated.
>>
>> The implementation takes advantage of the unused bits in the per-page
>> byte returned for each PAGE_SIZE extent of a given address range.  The
>> new format of each vector byte is:
>>
>> (TLB_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) << 2 | vma_is_dax() << 1 | page_present
>>
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/7/61
>>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/syscalls.h               |    2 +
>>  include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h |    3 +
>>  kernel/sys_ni.c                        |    1
>>  mm/mincore.c                           |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  4 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/syscalls.h b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>> index d02239022bd0..4aa2ee7e359a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/syscalls.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/syscalls.h
>> @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ asmlinkage long sys_munlockall(void);
>>  asmlinkage long sys_madvise(unsigned long start, size_t len, int behavior);
>>  asmlinkage long sys_mincore(unsigned long start, size_t len,
>>                               unsigned char __user * vec);
>> +asmlinkage long sys_mincore2(unsigned long start, size_t len,
>> +                             unsigned char __user * vec, int flags);
>
> We had few attempts to extand mincore(2) interface/functionality before.
> None of them ended up in upsteam.
>
> How this attempt compares to previous?

Not sure, I'm wading into this cold trying to get my pet problem
solved, hence the RFC.