[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A1C7978@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:26:07 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] ia64: implement atomic64_dec_if_positive
+static __inline__ long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+ long c, old, dec;
+ c = atomic64_read(v);
+ for (;;) {
+ dec = c - 1;
+ if (unlikely(dec < 0))
+ break;
+ old = atomic64_cmpxchg((v), c, dec);
+ if (likely(old == c))
+ break;
+ c = old;
+ }
+ return dec;
+}
I was about to say "add a cpu_relax()" in the bottom of that loop. But none of the other
atomic ops that spin on a cmpxchg do that ... so:
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists