[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160913064622.GA4047@osiris>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:46:22 +0200
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubsan: allow to disable the null sanitizer
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:37:19PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Some architectures use a hardware defined struct at address zero.
> Checking for a null pointer will result in many ubsan reports.
> Let users disable the null sanitizer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.ubsan | 11 +++++++++++
> scripts/Makefile.ubsan | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> index 39494af..851c3f2 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.ubsan
> @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
> config ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> bool
>
> +config ARCH_WANTS_UBSAN_NO_NULL
> + def_bool n
> +
> config UBSAN
> bool "Undefined behaviour sanity checker"
> help
> @@ -34,3 +37,11 @@ config UBSAN_ALIGNMENT
> This option enables detection of unaligned memory accesses.
> Enabling this option on architectures that support unaligned
> accesses may produce a lot of false positives.
> +
> +config UBSAN_NULL
> + bool "Enable checking of null pointers"
> + depends on UBSAN
> + default y if UBSAN && !ARCH_WANTS_UBSAN_NO_NULL
I removed the not needed UBSAN from the "default y" and applied both
patches to the s390 tree.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists