linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4d3c39c-ad81-69f6-7c20-8ecc7a406631@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Mon, 12 Sep 2016 20:05:55 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/192] 4.4.21-stable review

On 09/12/2016 09:58 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Many thanks for the majority of these patches to Sasha Levin, who dug
> them out of Canonical's 4.4 kernel tree.  I have no idea why they never
> sent them in for inclusion on their own :(
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.21 release.
> There are 192 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed Sep 14 15:21:31 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
	total: 149 pass: 149 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 101 pass: 101 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

Guenter