linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net-next: dsa: add new driver for qca8xxx family

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 17:59:26 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        qsdk-review@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net-next: dsa: add new driver for qca8xxx family

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> this function does indeed duplicate the functionality of
> phy_ethtool_get_eee() with the small difference, that e->eee_active is
> also set which phy_ethtool_get_eee() does not set.
> 
> dsa_slave_get_eee() will call phy_ethtool_get_eee() right after the
> get_eee() op has been called. would it be ok to move the code setting
> eee_active to  phy_ethtool_get_eee().

Hi John

I think that is a question for Florian.

  Andrew