linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: save and restore device state during bus reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:22:42 -0400
From:   Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        cov@...eaurora.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
        vikrams@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: save and restore device state during bus reset

Hi Bjorn,

On 9/13/2016 12:42 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> 
> This comment is no longer correct (you don't leave the devices in
> power-on state).

Sorry about that, I can fix the comment.

> 
>> + */
>> +void pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> +	pci_bus_save_and_disable(dev->bus);
> 
> "dev" is a bridge, and dev->bus is the bus on the *primary* side of
> the bridge, so I think this saves and disables the bridge itself.
> Don't you want dev->subordinate here instead?

Yes, I need the subordinate. 

> 
>> +	pcibios_reset_secondary_bus(dev);
>> +	pci_bus_restore(dev->bus);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus);
>> +


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.