[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473792356.31972.0.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:45:56 -0400
From: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Aleksey Makarov <amakarov.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Al Stone <ahs3@...hat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] ARM64: ACPI: enable ACPI_SPCR_TABLE
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:28 +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2016/9/9 0:34, Mark Salter wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 12:16 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:30:19PM +0300, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 09/05/2016 03:36 PM, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SBBR mentions SPCR as a mandatory ACPI table. So enable it for ARM64
> > > > >
> > > > > Earlycon should be set up as early as possible. ACPI boot tables are
> > > > > mapped in arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:acpi_boot_table_init() that
> > > > > is called from setup_arch() and that's where we parse SPCR.
> > > > > So it has to be opted-in per-arch.
> > > > >
> > > > > When ACPI_SPCR_TABLE is defined initialization of DT earlycon is
> > > > > deferred until the DT/ACPI decision is done. Initialize DT earlycon
> > > > > if ACPI is disabled.
> > > > Hi Will, Catalin,
> > > >
> > > > Can you review this patch and consider ACKing it please?
> > > Hanjun, Al, Mark, Graeme -- any comments on this?
> > >
> > > Will
> > I think there is a problem still with systems using 32-bit access to 8250
> > UARTs (i.e. Mustang) but that will need a DBG2 table spec change and
> > followup patch to resolve.
> Hmm, I think you mean we can add patches later with the spec updated,
> and this patch works with SBSA pl011 can go for now?
Yes, I think this series is fine for now.
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists