[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60a7f96e-631d-1f2f-f359-901584361406@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 20:56:26 +0200
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc: "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] leds: gpio: fix and simplify reading property "label"
Checking for the presence of the property first isn't strictly needed
as we can react on the return code of fwnode_property_read_string.
Also, even if the presence of a property "label" was checked,
reading a string value for it theoretically still can fail and
this case isn't handled.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
---
drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 16 +++++++---------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
index 171ba2f..00a24e3 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
@@ -181,16 +181,14 @@ static struct gpio_leds_priv *gpio_leds_create(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
- if (fwnode_property_present(child, "label")) {
- fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &led.name);
- } else {
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && !led.name && np)
- led.name = np->name;
- if (!led.name) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err;
- }
+ ret = fwnode_property_read_string(child, "label", &led.name);
+ if (ret && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np)
+ led.name = np->name;
+ if (!led.name) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
}
+
fwnode_property_read_string(child, "linux,default-trigger",
&led.default_trigger);
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists