[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPz6YkXq_QPffYgBJZGxZG9SboTVoCEH2qqCgAuB6YYj1e95ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 13:27:39 -0700
From: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com,
jmarchan@...hat.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, oleg@...hat.com,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Janis Danisevskis <jdanis@...gle.com>, calvinowens@...com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Zhang <benzh@...omium.org>,
Bryan Freed <bfreed@...omium.org>,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...omium.org>,
Jann Horn <jann@...jh.net>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] mm, proc: Implement /proc/<pid>/totmaps
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon 12-09-16 10:28:53, Sonny Rao wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon 12-09-16 08:31:36, Sonny Rao wrote:
> [...]
>> >> but how about the other fields like Swap, Private_Dirty and
>> >> Private_Shared?
>> >
>> > Private_Shared can be pretty confusing as well without the whole context
>> > as well see my other emails in the original thread (just to remind
>> > shmem/tmpfs makes all this really confusing).
>>
>> But this is exactly the issue -- RSS is can be just as confusing if
>> you don't know something about the application.
>
> I agree that rss can be confusing but we will not make the situation any
> better if we add yet another confusing metric.
>
>> I think the issue is
>> how common that situation is, and you seem to believe that it's so
>> uncommon that it's actually better to keep the information more
>> difficult to get for those of us who know something about our systems.
>>
>> That's fine, I guess we just have to disagree here, thanks for look at this.
>
> I think you should just step back and think more about what exactly
> you expect from the counter(s). I believe what you want is an
> estimate of a freeable memory when the particular process dies or is
> killed. That would mean resident single mapped private anonymous memory
> + unlinked single mapped shareable mappings + single mapped swapped out
> memory. Maybe I've missed something but it should be something along
> those lines. Definitely something that the current smaps infrastructure
> doesn't give you, though.
Yes your description of what we want is pretty good. Having a
reasonable lower bound on the estimate is fine, though we probably
want to break out swapped out memory separately. Given that smaps
doesn't provide this in a straightforward way, what do you think is
the right way to provide this information?
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists