[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iPh2io4S4LpyFvgn9NcoOUEHU25uBz3aSZPJaxbZJZoA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 21:06:49 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Yumei Huang <yuhuang@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
mtosatti@...hat.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: DAX mapping detection (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix region lost in /proc/self/smaps)
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2016 08:01:48 -0700
[..]
> That said, a noop system call is on the order of 100 cycles nowadays,
> so rushing to implement these APIs without seeing good numbers and
> actual users ready to go seems premature. *This* is the real reason
> not to implement new APIs yet.
Yes, and harvesting the current crop of low hanging performance fruit
in the filesystem-DAX I/O path remains on the todo list.
In the meantime we're pursuing this mm api, mincore+ or whatever we
end up with, to allow userspace to distinguish memory address ranges
that are backed by a filesystem requiring coordination of metadata
updates + flushes for updates, vs something like device-dax that does
not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists