| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160914082535.3304d51a1a6a085234f77529@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:25:35 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
jolsa@...nel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] perf tools: adding support for address filters
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:18:10 -0600
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 04:01, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com> wrote:
> > On 12/09/16 20:53, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >> This patch makes it possible to use the current filter
> >> framework with address filters. That way address filters for
> >> HW tracers such as CoreSight and IntelPT can be communicated
> >> to the kernel drivers.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Changes for V5:
> >> - Modified perf_evsel__append_filter() to take a string format
> >> rather than an operation.
> >
> > Hope I'm not being a pain, but aren't there other places calling
> > perf_evsel__append_filter() that need to be changed. Might make
> > sense as a separate patch.
>
> No no, you're right - I completely overlooked that.
>
> But shouldn't it be in the same patch? That way a git bisect would
> stay consistent...
You're right. Caller and callee should be changed in atomic.
BTW, could you add document updates how the perf command line
will be changed, and also show the result in the patch description?
Thank you,
>
> >
> >>
> >> Changes for V4:
> >> - Added support for address filters over more than one
> >> nibble.
> >> - Removed Jiri's ack, this version is too different from
> >> what was reviewed.
> >>
> >> Changes for V3:
> >> - Added Jiri's ack.
> >> - Rebased to v4.8-rc5.
> >>
> >> Changes for V2:
> >> - Rebased to v4.8-rc4.
> >> - Revisited error path.
> >>
> >>
> >> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 4 ++--
> >> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 +-
> >> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> >> index d40f852d2de2..a9bb277f221f 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> >> @@ -1047,14 +1047,14 @@ int perf_evsel__set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter)
> >> }
> >>
> >> int perf_evsel__append_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> >> - const char *op, const char *filter)
> >> + const char *fmt, const char *filter)
> >> {
> >> char *new_filter;
> >>
> >> if (evsel->filter == NULL)
> >> return perf_evsel__set_filter(evsel, filter);
> >>
> >> - if (asprintf(&new_filter,"(%s) %s (%s)", evsel->filter, op, filter) > 0) {
> >> + if (asprintf(&new_filter, fmt, evsel->filter, filter) > 0) {
> >> free(evsel->filter);
> >> evsel->filter = new_filter;
> >> return 0;
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> >> index 8ceb7ebb51f5..50595c8c7207 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> >> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ void perf_evsel__set_sample_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> >>
> >> int perf_evsel__set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter);
> >> int perf_evsel__append_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> >> - const char *op, const char *filter);
> >> + const char *fmt, const char *filter);
> >> int perf_evsel__apply_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads,
> >> const char *filter);
> >> int perf_evsel__apply_drv_configs(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> index 2eb8b1ed4cc8..8e683979ccd8 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> >> @@ -1760,20 +1760,50 @@ foreach_evsel_in_last_glob(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> >> static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const void *arg)
> >> {
> >> const char *str = arg;
> >> + bool found = false;
> >> + int nr_addr_filters = 0;
> >> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
> >>
> >> - if (evsel == NULL || evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
> >> - fprintf(stderr,
> >> - "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint option\n");
> >> - return -1;
> >> + if (evsel == NULL)
> >> + goto err;
> >> +
> >> + if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
> >> + if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel,
> >> + "(%s) && (%s)", str) < 0) {
> >> + fprintf(stderr,
> >> + "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
> >> + return -1;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "&&", str) < 0) {
> >> + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
> >> + if (pmu->type == evsel->attr.type) {
> >> + found = true;
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (found)
> >> + perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, "nr_addr_filters",
> >> + "%d", &nr_addr_filters);
> >> +
> >> + if (!nr_addr_filters)
> >> + goto err;
> >> +
> >> + if (perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "%s,%s", str) < 0) {
> >> fprintf(stderr,
> >> "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
> >> return -1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> return 0;
> >> +
> >> +err:
> >> + fprintf(stderr,
> >> + "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW tracer option\n");
> >> +
> >> + return -1;
> >> }
> >>
> >> int parse_filter(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
> >>
> >
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists