linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver: base: pinctrl: return error from pinctrl_bind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57D8EC88.1060808@mentor.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:52:00 +0530
From:   Deepak Das <deepak_das@...tor.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        vzapolsk <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver: base: pinctrl: return error from
 pinctrl_bind_pins()



On Wednesday 14 September 2016 02:31 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Deepak Das <deepak_das@...tor.com> wrote:
>
>>> Can you confim that this works for you too?
>>
>> Yes, This works for me as well but do we really need this extra error
>> message ?
>
> Nah, good point. I'll go in and drop it then.

Hi Linus,

I will release V2 version of this patch with following change :-
-       /* Only return deferrals */
+       /* Return deferrals & invalid pin requests */
         if ((ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) && (ret != -EINVAL))
                 ret = 0;

Thanks & regards,
Deepak Das

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>