[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57D8EF6A.2050200@mentor.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:04:18 +0530
From: Deepak Das <deepak_das@...tor.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: vzapolsk <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] driver: base: pinctrl: return error from,
pinctrl_bind_pins()
strict pin controller returns -EINVAL in case of pin request which
is already claimed by somebody else.
Following is the sequence of calling pin_request() from
pinctrl_bind_pins():-
pinctrl_bind_pins()->pinctrl_select_state()->pinmux_enable_setting()->
pin_request()
But pinctrl_bind_pins() only returns -EPROBE_DEFER which makes device
driver probe successful even if the pin request is rejected by the pin
controller subsystem.
This commit modifies pinctrl_bind_pins() to return error if the pin is
rejected by pin control subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Das <deepak_das@...tor.com>
---
Changes from v1 to v2:
* Modified the comment to indicate return error in case of
invalid pin requests
drivers/base/pinctrl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/pinctrl.c b/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
index 5fb74b4..12f0eb5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/base/pinctrl.c
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ cleanup_alloc:
devm_kfree(dev, dev->pins);
dev->pins = NULL;
- /* Only return deferrals */
- if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ /* Return deferrals & invalid pin requests */
+ if ((ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) && (ret != -EINVAL))
ret = 0;
return ret;
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists