[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871t0np7qj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:53:24 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
peterz@...radead.org, maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 00/20] perf, tools: Add support for PMU events in JSON format
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:15:30AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > I've already made some changes in pmu-events/* to support
>> > > > this hierarchy to see how bad the change would be.. and
>> > > > it's not that bad ;-)
>> > >
>> > > Everything has to be automated, please no manual changes.
>> >
>> > sure
>> >
>> > so, if you're ok with the layout, how do you want to proceed further?
>>
>> If the split version is acceptable it's fine for me to merge it.
>>
>> I'll add split-json to my scripting, so the next update would
>> be split too.
>
> ook, I'll wait for patches then
Who are you waiting for patches from?
Would be great if this could go in for 4.9 still.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists