linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] irqchip or mfd/tps65217: fix link error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609141129440.6233@nanos>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:31:17 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] irqchip or mfd/tps65217: fix link error

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Building tps65217 as a loadable module (as done in allmodconfig)
> now fails after we started calling irq_set_parent():
> 
>   ERROR: "irq_set_parent" [drivers/mfd/tps65217.ko] undefined!
> 
> The two obvious workarounds are either to force the driver
> to be built-in, or to make that symbol exported to modules.
> 
> As it's not clear to me if either of them would be acceptable,
> I'm sending both of them here, please comment on which one
> you want to have, or whether the driver should handle this
> differently and not call irq_set_parent() at all.

The question is why it needs to call that. But if it's justified, then I'm
not opposed to export it.

Thanks,

	tglx