linux-kernel - Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160914094902.GA14330@leverpostej>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:49:02 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-x86_64@...r.kernel.org, juerg.haefliger@....com,
        vpk@...columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for eXclusive
 Page Frame Ownership (XPFO)

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:36:34AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:18:58AM +0200, Juerg Haefliger wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for XPFO which protects against 'ret2dir'
> > kernel attacks. The basic idea is to enforce exclusive ownership of page
> > frames by either the kernel or userspace, unless explicitly requested by
> > the kernel. Whenever a page destined for userspace is allocated, it is
> > unmapped from physmap (the kernel's page table). When such a page is
> > reclaimed from userspace, it is mapped back to physmap.

> > Reference paper by the original patch authors:
> >   http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~vpk/papers/ret2dir.sec14.pdf

> For both arm64 and x86_64, DEBUG_RODATA is mandatory (or soon to be so).
> Assuming that implies a lack of execute permission for x86_64, that
> should provide a similar level of protection against erroneously
> branching to addresses in the linear map, without the complexity and
> overhead of mapping/unmapping pages.
> 
> So to me it looks like this approach may only be useful for
> architectures without page-granular execute permission controls.
> 
> Is this also intended to protect against erroneous *data* accesses to
> the linear map?

Now that I read the paper more carefully, I can see that this is the
case, and this does catch issues which DEBUG_RODATA cannot.

Apologies for the noise.

Thanks,
Mark.