linux-kernel - [PATCH 09/11] virtio_console: Rename a jump label in __send_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30bfb090-db1c-6515-2d13-0acd6e67d1c2@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:08:13 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] virtio_console: Rename a jump label in __send_to_port()

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:15:06 +0200

Adjust a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
index babc812..69c6718 100644
--- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
@@ -634,14 +634,14 @@ static ssize_t __send_to_port(struct port *port, struct scatterlist *sg,
 
 	if (err) {
 		in_count = 0;
-		goto done;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	if (out_vq->num_free == 0)
 		port->outvq_full = true;
 
 	if (nonblock)
-		goto done;
+		goto unlock;
 
 	/*
 	 * Wait till the host acknowledges it pushed out the data we
@@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static ssize_t __send_to_port(struct port *port, struct scatterlist *sg,
 	while (!virtqueue_get_buf(out_vq, &len)
 		&& !virtqueue_is_broken(out_vq))
 		cpu_relax();
-done:
+ unlock:
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&port->outvq_lock, flags);
 
 	port->stats.bytes_sent += in_count;
-- 
2.10.0