linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Remove redundant newline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E886A184A06@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 03:14:27 +0000
From:   "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@...el.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Remove redundant newline

Hi,

> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@...ches.com]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPICA / Interpreter: Remove redundant newline
> 
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 20:40 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:26:17PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > > Is this a big deal?
> > > We do this on purpose for AcpiExec, to make the screen output more readable.
> []
> > What do you mean "big deal"? All other ACPI_INFO calls don't have a "\n"
> > at the end except this one. How does one "\n" make some output more
> > readable?
> 
> Blank lines in logging/dmesg generally don't add value.
> 
> I would prefer if the unnecessary double parentheses also
> were removed in these macro uses and ##__VA_ARGS__ was
> used instead.

Ideally correct.
But __VA_ARGS__ is not portable.
And ACPICA is used in other environment.
I'd prefer to eliminate debugging/logging macros, but implement debugging/logging functions instead.
As stdarg is more portable than __VA_ARGS__.

Thanks and best regards
Lv

> 
> /*
>  * Error reporting. Callers module and line number are inserted by AE_INFO,
>  * the plist contains a set of parens to allow variable-length lists.
>  * These macros are used for both the debug and non-debug versions of the code.
>  */
> #define ACPI_INFO(plist)                acpi_info plist
> #define ACPI_WARNING(plist)             acpi_warning plist
> #define ACPI_EXCEPTION(plist)           acpi_exception plist
> #define ACPI_ERROR(plist)               acpi_error plist
> #define ACPI_BIOS_WARNING(plist)        acpi_bios_warning plist
> #define ACPI_BIOS_ERROR(plist)          acpi_bios_error plist
> 
> It would also be good if format/argument verification
> was done here and in the non-debug macro variants.
> 
> #define ACPI_INFO(plist)
> #define ACPI_WARNING(plist)
> #define ACPI_EXCEPTION(plist)
> #define ACPI_ERROR(plist)
> #define ACPI_BIOS_WARNING(plist)
> #define ACPI_BIOS_ERROR(plist)