[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160914160602.GB11131@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:06:02 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: "jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] tpm/tpm_crb: implement power management.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 06:28:03AM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 16:04 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > Te overall platform ability to enter a low power state is also
> > conditioned on the ability of a tpm device to go to idle state.
> > This series should provide this feature.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there is a HW bug on Intel PTT devices on Skylake,
> > Kabylake, and Broxton devices, where certain registers lost retention
> > during TPM idle state. Hence this implementation takes this into
> > consideration and implement the feature based only on access to
> > registers that retain their state. This still conforms to the spec
> > and should be correct also on non Intle devices.
> >
> > V2: Utilize runtime_pm for driving tpm crb idle states.
> > V3. fix lower case corruption in the first patch
> >
> Jarkko, had you chance to test v3 series one on your side, is this okay
> to go?
Opens for me are:
- pm_runtime_put_sync() is still used
- callback names
- wait_for_tpm_stat
> Thanks
> Tomas
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists