lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1473871930-99603-3-git-send-email-mka@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:52:07 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, lgirdwood@...il.com
Cc:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>, briannorris@...omium.org,
        javier@...hile0.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/6] regulator: core: Don't skip set_voltage_time when ramp delay disabled

The current code assumes that only the ramp_delay is used to determine
the time needed for the voltage to stabilize. This may be true for the
calculation done by regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(), however regulators
can implement their own set_voltage_time_sel() op which would be skipped
if no ramp delay is specified. Remove the check in
_regulator_do_set_voltage(), the functions calculating the ramp delay
return 0 anyway when the ramp delay is not configured.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- This patch is new for v5.

 drivers/regulator/core.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index b0076cc..df3028b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2804,9 +2804,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_set_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 		goto out;
 
 	/* Call set_voltage_time_sel if successfully obtained old_selector */
-	if (!rdev->constraints->ramp_disable && old_selector >= 0
-		&& old_selector != selector) {
-
+	if (!old_selector >= 0 && old_selector != selector) {
 		delay = ops->set_voltage_time_sel(rdev,
 						old_selector, selector);
 		if (delay < 0) {
@@ -3051,10 +3049,8 @@ int regulator_set_voltage_time_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	else if (rdev->desc->ramp_delay)
 		ramp_delay = rdev->desc->ramp_delay;
 
-	if (ramp_delay == 0) {
-		rdev_warn(rdev, "ramp_delay not set\n");
+	if (ramp_delay == 0)
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	/* sanity check */
 	if (!rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage)
-- 
2.8.0.rc3.226.g39d4020

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ