linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arc: perf: Enable generic "cache-references" and "cache-misses" events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9ee8ab7-815b-f213-d61b-30dcf1cbf61f@synopsys.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:53:48 -0700
From:   Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
To:     Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arc: perf: Enable generic "cache-references" and
 "cache-misses" events

On 08/26/2016 10:30 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 08/25/2016 04:49 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> ...
>>  	[PERF_COUNT_ARC_EDTLB] = "edtlb",	/* D-TLB Miss */
>>  	[PERF_COUNT_ARC_EITLB] = "eitlb",	/* I-TLB Miss */
>> +
>> +	[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = "imemrdc",	/* Instr: mem read cached */
>> +	[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = "dclm",		/* D-cache Load Miss */
> 
> I think this is duplicating a mistake we already have. I vaguely remember when
> doing some hackbench profiling last year with range based profiling confined to
> memset routine and saw that L1-dcache-misses was counting zero. This is because it
> only counts LD misses while memset only does ST.

So given that this is the best we got, I'm going to merge this anyways.

-Vineet

> 
> Performance counter stats for '/sbin/hackbench':
> 
>      0 L1-dcache-misses
>      0 L1-dcache-load-misses
>      1846082 L1-dcache-store-misses
> 
> 
> @PeterZ do you concur that is wrong and we ought to setup 2 counters to do this
> correctly ?
> 
> -Vineet
>